How Safe Is Science?

HOW
SAFE IS
SCIENCE?

The realization that the most common food we are feeding to our body in the Western world could turn into a cereal killer has been shaking the globe for two decades now: Wheat!

"80% of American people", health activist Robert F. Kennedy jr. claims, "are either pre-diabetic, diabetic, or obese." Gluten, a gluey little protein, plays a pivotal role in that equation. That was not the plan, when scientists started to tamper with the genetics of the former healthy grain.
Over the course of their lifetime, scientists make thousands of seemingly groundbreaking assumptions – and then discard them again. Some after days, others after weeks, or years. Usually 50% need to be dumped five years, after they finished medical school. However, one that has remained unshakable up til now is this: "Wheat is healthy." It is not only found in white bread, but also in grainy brown bread. It is not only the basic ingredient in tarts and cookies, but also in crunchy mueslis. And now this: 90 percent of our processed foods contain that part of wheat that can make you sick in what seems to be countless ways: gluten.

Gluten intolerance is turning medicine as we knew it upside down. Many inexplicable illnesses appear in a new light: chronic back pain , heart attacks, diabetes, cancer, chronic intestinal inflammation like IBS or Leaky Gut, restless legs, autism, memory loss, depression - all of which have been identified by renowned experts as consequences of gluten intolerance. Consolidated and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
The US has turned gluten intolerance into a $5 billion business. Cardboard like, gluten-free products without a hint of vitamins already pile up on supermarket shelves. Once the pharmaceutical industry gets involved and develops a genetically manipulated drug to combat the effects of genetically manipulated wheat... then the economy will rise and shine again, and even Wall Street might recover.

We have known for a long period of time that eating too much and too sugary food makes us sick. But this whole chain of illnesses triggered by fresh bread, innocent pasta, morning cereal, fragrant biscuits, crispy pizza? Yes. For every three diagnosed cases of celiac disease, the most severe expression of gluten sensitivity, there are 97 who still have no idea of their misfortune. In the vast majority of cases, it takes years (mainly 7), if not decades, for a proper diagnosis. And to be precise, there are no rock solid testing methods for "simple" gluten intolerance, only more or less solids for celiac disease.

Riding On Loose Canon Balls

We once felt safe when we went to the bakery. That is long gone. We did not know yet the effects of genetically manipulated wheat - just as we do not know the long-term effects of genetic manipulation - in which the protein content of wheat was inflated by 40 percent. Super wheat. Sounds good. But for many, it turned out to be disastrous... and its long-term side effects, or so it seems, are as frightening as those of improperly consumed antibiotics. Or vaccines.
Only now, after the monstrous Covid mRNA disaster, humanity is slowly anticipating an idea of the slippery slope it is being led onto with scientifically cemented "facts".

As far as the use of antibiotics is concerned, it has taken decades to understand: Their effectiveness absolutely depends on their correct use. But often even doctors do not know this. They prescribe them against viruses, which is not only useless, but even harmful to our internal ecosystem. They do not advise patients that the tablets must be taken to the end as directed under all circumstances, even if you feel fit again on day 3.
And patients, for their part, at the other end of the chain of action often just do what they please, against all reason. So the highly potent drugs eventually turned against us, to a terrifying extent. Antibiotic resistance will become one of the most serious health risks by 2030. Combined with something as seemingly harmless as gluten antibiotics may attack the anyway inflamed intestinal mucosa, albeit from a different direction. When bothmeet - too many antibiotics, too much gluten - the whole thing is exacerbated. We have been riding a loose canon for about 50 years, unsuspecting.

SCIENTIFIC TRUTH: CARRYING THE ERROR WITHIN

A so-called paradigm shift is normal in the natural sciences. First the wise men thought the earth was flat. Then they realized: No, the earth is round. There are always discoveries like this or similar that need to be corrected. What was previously killed for, with words and deeds, was simply: an error. We long for answers that will last forever... especially when we become ill and vulnerable. But fact is: They don't exist, at least not where we are looking for them.
An atom is harmless in itself, as long as nobody builds a nuclear bomb out of it. Wheat is harmless in itself, as long as nobody turns it into super wheat. Antibiotics are not harmless, but have more often than not saved lives when administered for precisely defined indications. Even homeopathy is not harmless if you keep taking high potencies indiscriminately and without competent experts. If there is anything true in life and medicine, it is what Paracelsus said: The dose makes the poison.

What we believe to be carved in stone is, best case senario, just an assumption that has been confirmed by many people over a long period of time. Such as the effectiveness of aspirin, for example – even if until today, we don't even know why most of the components actually work. With aspirin, the benefits far outweigh the harm. Not even many vitamin tablets can claim that.

As it happened with the Covid-vaccination, we seemingly have risked our lives to save ourselves,
In the world of science, many egos in freshly starched lab coats rush through corridors and defend the status quo. How far they would actually go has become legend (not only) through the famous example of Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis: The Viennese obstetrician recommended that his colleagues should wash their hands thoroughly before examining recent moms. Until then, doctors had marched straight from the dissection room to the mothers and transferred the corpse poisons to breasts and birth wounds. The maternal mortality dropped from 12.3 to 1.3 percent through Europe, as doctors finally condescendingly followed Semmelweis's advice. Cancelled by his colleagues, Ignaz Semmelweis eventually died of blood poisoning in a psychiatric clinic, having gone almost insane. He was long dead when Rudolf Virchow discovered the actual existence of bacteria, which proved Semmelweis' theory correct.

How safe is safe exactly ?

Only through their own experience could doctors and patients learn that a new generation of rheumatism drugs, so-called COX-2 inhibitors, were a bitter example of dashed hopes. They were supposed to put an end to the pain and had to be taken off the market again after a short time because they had life-threatening side effects… with 55.000 people dying from the drugs. 
Despite massive side effects in 25% of users, statins were prescribed to treat high cholesterol. Today we know that it is only when the levels of LDL are extremely high that they are harmful to the heart. 
Calcium, which is regularly recommended to menopausal women to strengthen their bones, turns out to be a sneaky enemy of the heart. 
The same goes for the hormones that are supposed to suppress the hot flushes of menopause and ease mood swings. Not only did heart attacks increase dramatically under their influence, but also thrombosis (life-threatening blood clots) and breast cancer - so much so that the comparative studies involving 100,000 women had to be stopped. But before that, in the 1970s to 2000s, tens of millions of women in the western world had already taken these very hormones because they were told that they were "natural" and therefore had no side effects. 
At the vaccination front against Covid, it didn't even fulfill the criteria of vaccination: it did not protect against infection, transmission or death. It hand't even been tested for it!

Choice is the answer

Experts and their patients have learned the hard way through experience that although chemotherapy is administered on an overwhelming scale, it is only effective in curing around 10% of all cancers, such as childhood leukemia, testicular cancer or certain lymphomas. This is assuming the disease was discovered early enough. 
The statistics for breast cancer are even worse: 80% of women receive chemotherapy. But only 20% actually benefit from it. Hardly any woman is informed of these facts by her doctor. Unfortunately, in many cases it is not known exactly which women will benefit, so they are often administered as a precaution. But today state of the art is at least one testing cycle before the operation to see whether the tumor responds at all, and shrinks. 
"The five-year survival rate does not mean that you are healthy", one expert explained to us. "It just means that you have survived those five years. If the cancer returns just a week later, it is considered a new disease from a conventional medical point of view."

Who is most interested in your cure?

Science and related businesses or organisations like the FDA or the RKI, or the pharmaceutical industries go far, often too far, to lull the public into a false sense of security – and to sell certainty. This is precisely why patients believing what "science says" miss out on important opportunities:

for example those offered by complementary medicine which has, additionally administered, proven to be extremely helpful (not only) in cases of cancer; first and foremost nutrition because cancer can only thrive on sugar.  

There are the benefits of psycho-oncology to help deal with the terrible horror of the disease; acupuncture, homeopathy, mistletoe therapy, to name just a few.

No matter how good a therapy is, how new, how modern, how groundbreaking it seams: only time can tell whether it really keeps its promise. And even if it does: our instinct, common sense, our inner voice are always called for.
“The integrity of the soul is just as important as physical integrity", Hamburg's breast cancer expert Prof. Dr. Peter Schmidt-Rhode once said at one of our information events for patients. “Only if a woman is fully aligned with her treatment can the therapy be effective.” Considered the amount of people, who were not to the slightest aligned with covid measurements and actions taken; who were only giving in and giving up, it will be interesting what the future will show.